the first letter is very uncertain, though all the editors restore (k). Jaussen and Savignac doubt whether the third letter is "r" or "h". They restore the last letter as (n), though in the facsimile it is (q). RES and Garbini follow the facsimile.

Line: 1

...]dt yths¹, according to Jaussen and Savignac, as they do not see clearly the "b" and consider the space between the word separator and the "y" too small for a letter. They interpret the word as a VIII form of the verb whs¹.

Line: 2

Jaussen and Savignac read b-kl, although pointing also to the parallel "Bs¹l" in M 289, l.2. RES prefers this second option.

Line: 3

s¹lhm (all the editors); but the "l" could also be a "m".

Line: 5